Post by lawsinium on Sept 16, 2011 0:01:50 GMT -5
The first criticism that Ufologists gets from skeptics is that " Ufology allegedly refuses to play the rules of scientific thought."
I believe this is not true and we are not crackpots!!!
To prove this skeptics’ argument is false let me present here some scientific facts that will prove that UFOs are real. I will simply highlight the main topics on a list (detailed explanations can be found in the thread "are UFO encounters real?"
1. A gigantic mothership is needed in order to fly from one galaxy to galaxy. Ufologists also study the logistics, physics, materials and structural design of an aircraft.
2. Sonic booms, radiations and other aerodynamics principles like bernouillis and venturi are also being taken into account in studying spaceship moving more than 10x the speed of sound at different levels of the atmosphere and beyond.
3. Lights eminating from lightbulbs for navigation and lighting purposes might be applicable here on earth but not in outerspace. Highly intelligent aliens will either use the extremes side of the electromagnetic spectrum with the least of using either the infrared or the ultraviolet bands but not the visible light which can be detected by humans without special tools but their eyes.
4. Communications between humans and space humans (iff mankind descendants) are likely feasible, in contrast with SETI's mission of communicating with space aliens or another specie not of human origin out there is highly improbable.
5. Humans don’t have a concrete definition and composition of life....Scientists suggested our origin also started from the big bang….a false theory debunked by other fellow scientists.
6. Ufologists are also made up of scientists, engineers, programmers, lawyers, authors, and crackpot like me.
All of these claims play the rules of scientific thoughts that strengthen my beliefs that UFO exists.
In fact, the two UFO sightings that I have experienced which happened in outer space provided me the scientific clues that I enumerated above.
So for the skeptics out there .... what is your counter argument with my UFO experiences below???
The first encounter was when this light was moving from right to left passing in between "stars"(white round objects) continuously in a straight line.
The second encounter was…. looking at the same line of sight facing the starry sky .... this same size and brightest of a moving light ....coming slowly from behind another light like an eclipse .... was moving in the same path like of the first encounter …. However ....this time it was as if about to hit a fixed star … then slowly moved upward as if it was evading a collision ...then made a round by following the curvature of the "stationary round object" ... and returned back to its original normal trajectory or linear path.
Obviously these are not meteors, space shuttles, planets, atmospheric anomalies, lenticular clouds (spaceship-like), zodiacal lights (triangular-like), visual illusions (mirage), or sensory errors. I saw them with my two eyes. I was not sleeping, intoxicated, medicated or mentally delusional.
~joey
I believe this is not true and we are not crackpots!!!
To prove this skeptics’ argument is false let me present here some scientific facts that will prove that UFOs are real. I will simply highlight the main topics on a list (detailed explanations can be found in the thread "are UFO encounters real?"
1. A gigantic mothership is needed in order to fly from one galaxy to galaxy. Ufologists also study the logistics, physics, materials and structural design of an aircraft.
2. Sonic booms, radiations and other aerodynamics principles like bernouillis and venturi are also being taken into account in studying spaceship moving more than 10x the speed of sound at different levels of the atmosphere and beyond.
3. Lights eminating from lightbulbs for navigation and lighting purposes might be applicable here on earth but not in outerspace. Highly intelligent aliens will either use the extremes side of the electromagnetic spectrum with the least of using either the infrared or the ultraviolet bands but not the visible light which can be detected by humans without special tools but their eyes.
4. Communications between humans and space humans (iff mankind descendants) are likely feasible, in contrast with SETI's mission of communicating with space aliens or another specie not of human origin out there is highly improbable.
5. Humans don’t have a concrete definition and composition of life....Scientists suggested our origin also started from the big bang….a false theory debunked by other fellow scientists.
6. Ufologists are also made up of scientists, engineers, programmers, lawyers, authors, and crackpot like me.
All of these claims play the rules of scientific thoughts that strengthen my beliefs that UFO exists.
In fact, the two UFO sightings that I have experienced which happened in outer space provided me the scientific clues that I enumerated above.
So for the skeptics out there .... what is your counter argument with my UFO experiences below???
The first encounter was when this light was moving from right to left passing in between "stars"(white round objects) continuously in a straight line.
The second encounter was…. looking at the same line of sight facing the starry sky .... this same size and brightest of a moving light ....coming slowly from behind another light like an eclipse .... was moving in the same path like of the first encounter …. However ....this time it was as if about to hit a fixed star … then slowly moved upward as if it was evading a collision ...then made a round by following the curvature of the "stationary round object" ... and returned back to its original normal trajectory or linear path.
Obviously these are not meteors, space shuttles, planets, atmospheric anomalies, lenticular clouds (spaceship-like), zodiacal lights (triangular-like), visual illusions (mirage), or sensory errors. I saw them with my two eyes. I was not sleeping, intoxicated, medicated or mentally delusional.
~joey
