|
Post by mo on Jul 8, 2011 9:42:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skywalker on Jul 8, 2011 19:14:17 GMT -5
Those are both fakes, dude. It's just a couple of teenagers wearing glow in the dark pants. If you look closely at the one where they are walking down the hill you can see it is just a pair of human legs walking backwards. The little one that's further away is the most obvious.
|
|
|
Post by mo on Jul 11, 2011 11:55:52 GMT -5
Which video are you referring to. I would agree that all the videos are in questions for exception of the FRESNO CCTV video. This video was looked at by many people including MUFON investigators and have not proved it one way or the other. The witness also has been forward about all his information and seems to be honest. I do not know the extent of the investigation. Now the others, yes. There have been many copy cat video after the Fresno video was released.
Another thing to consider are the amount of witnesses that have described personal encounters with these very small and thin creatures/entities/ET etc in our cases files.
|
|
|
Post by skywalker on Jul 11, 2011 22:24:40 GMT -5
Sorry, dude. This is one of the videos that I was referring to where they were walking down the hill. If I remember correctly there were about a half-dozen videos made by these same people in the close to Fresno. Notice how it looks very similar to the second "being" in the original Fresno film.
|
|
|
Post by skywalker on Jul 11, 2011 22:27:24 GMT -5
I don't know about that one from Texas. I'll have to take a closer look at it.
|
|
|
Post by mo on Jul 12, 2011 7:42:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rhw7879 on Aug 1, 2011 11:23:28 GMT -5
For what I have been seeing the Fresno video is real. It was also on TV on a SYFi channel tried to replicate the stick figures and they couldn't do it either. Also, the video with the alien running by the person is a good one and I have not heard anyone debunking it. Just IMO... =)
|
|
jbj
New Member
Posts: 12
|
Post by jbj on Aug 2, 2011 11:34:12 GMT -5
In todays world, we have to throw out ALL digital submissions of true footage. It's just that it can be modified without too much effort.[ & that "sucks" if it's real!] Film is best. It can be modified also, but checking negatives & mods. are more detectable. a good vcr tape would most likely hold up better under analysis in my opinion. Kind of sad...progress knocking down truth because of technical possibilities.
|
|
|
Post by alienvisitor on Sept 5, 2011 21:54:08 GMT -5
A vcr tape? Are you kidding? Whats needed is a body.
|
|
|
Post by alienvisitor on Sept 5, 2011 21:58:05 GMT -5
Stick aliens look like they "wood" make good campfires lol !!!!
|
|
|
Post by skywalker on Sept 7, 2011 8:34:49 GMT -5
Maybe somebody burned all the bodies so there wouldn't be any evidence.
|
|
poman
New Member
Posts: 15
|
Post by poman on Sept 11, 2011 23:47:22 GMT -5
Hi all, new guy here I made a post a day or two ago entitled "I need help" in the abductions section. Anyway...... I understand how infrared cameras work but I fail to see how a regular closed circuit video camera (assuming it does not have infra red capabilities) can present an image in IR. How is it that they were able to take the video footage of the "stick aliens", from a normal camera, and magically make it infra red when there was no heat for the camera to measure?? To me that seems akin to reading a book without opening it. Can someone explain that to me please? Also, I agree that one must remain totally objective with pretty much everything you see and hear etc.....ESPECIALLY when dealing with second or third or 1000th-hand information.......and even more with video "evidence". It really is THAt easy to manipulate footage or create something entirely from scratch. I have been exposed to things that "normal" human beings simply can NOT do, that anyone is aware of anyway. So I KNOW that there is definitely more to this life/earth/universe than what we have been led to believe as we funnelled our way through those carefully scripted and structured educational and societal systems. But again, I do not claim to know the origins of the things I have experienced....for all I know maybe man-kind really has figured stuff out that defies all logic and comprehension. Anyway, I look forward to posting more and trying to participate in the discussions on this board. Regards, po
|
|
|
Post by lawsinium on Sept 12, 2011 17:48:31 GMT -5
those two guys are standing on sticks which make them taller. You can simply prove it by the locomotions of their bodies parallel to the strides of their feet. And poman's deduction is right. I thought mufon's investigate things methodologically, analytically and technologically. Was the video presented at the Mufon's conference for analysis or the presentor has already concluded that the video was real?
|
|
poman
New Member
Posts: 15
|
Post by poman on Sept 12, 2011 18:09:52 GMT -5
That is what I thought too.......I was surprised that a MUFON-led presentation would enter a piece of "evidence" that appears to be impossible to exist.
Unless I am wrong, how can you make a video of an image that is actually being displayed on a separate TV screen, and make that original image that is being played appear in infra-red or have the heat radiating from objects that don't really exist because all they are is an image on a completely separate TV screen?
Maybe I'm an idiot, but I fail to see how that is possible without maybe some 'super software' that can predict an objects heat load by some fancy method I have never heard of. ha-ha
In any case, I am highly skeptical of video footage these days, for these very reasons. As someone said earlier, the old VHS tapes are actually more reliable as they are harder to tamper with.
Bad MUFON, bad! he-he
|
|
|
Post by mo on Sept 13, 2011 11:33:23 GMT -5
That is what I thought too.......I was surprised that a MUFON-led presentation would enter a piece of "evidence" that appears to be impossible to exist. Unless I am wrong, how can you make a video of an image that is actually being displayed on a separate TV screen, and make that original image that is being played appear in infra-red or have the heat radiating from objects that don't really exist because all they are is an image on a completely separate TV screen? Maybe I'm an idiot, but I fail to see how that is possible without maybe some 'super software' that can predict an objects heat load by some fancy method I have never heard of. ha-ha In any case, I am highly skeptical of video footage these days, for these very reasons. As someone said earlier, the old VHS tapes are actually more reliable as they are harder to tamper with. Bad MUFON, bad! he-he Can you tell me which video you are referring to?
|
|